life. ministry. technology.

Posts tagged “faith

From 1 Corinthians

I am a fool.  A weak fool.  I am not of noble birth nor influential.  I have not much about which to boast – save Jesus Christ.  1 Corinthians reminds me that at have no cause for pride.  I have done nothing to earn the assurance I own.  It is easy to forget that outside of Jesus we are worthless, that we deserve death and hell.

Paul tells us “the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing.”  This is irony in its highest form.  The “world” is perishing.  It is lost and traveling easily the “wide road” that leads to destruction, and the very cure seems foolish to those who do not know of or deny the destruction that waits to seize them.
It is because of God that I am in Christ Jesus, who has become for me the wisdom of God.  Being reminded of what I was when I was called, I was no one and nothing.  The only thing I had produced for myself was a debt of sin I could not pay.  But through Christ whom I have accepted as Lord and Saviour, I am called to share his “foolishness” with the world, that foolishness that is wiser than man’s wisdom and his weakness, stronger than man’s strength.

“Of First Importance”

A response to someone’s question: “Is it necessary for the Christian to believe Jesus was actually raised form the dead? 

Paul reminds his readers in no uncertain terms that the actual, physical, historically accurate resurrection of Jesus from the grave following his crucifixion is of first importance.  The resurrection is Christianity, and without it there is none.  Paul removes any doubt of his opinion in 1 Corinthians 15:14 when he writes, “And if Christ has not been raised from the dead, our preaching is useless and so is your faith.” Without a resurrected Christ all of Christendom is moot.

Jesus’ resurrection proves prophesy concerning the Christ, that spoken by himself and that written centuries before his birth.  The empty tomb sets Jesus apart from all the other zealots before and since who have claimed for themselves Jesus’ standing as Messiah.  There had been many such movements before Jesus began his ministry, and recent history reminds us of the great many since.  There is an undeniable, unavoidable common denominator shared by the David Koreshes and Jim Joneses of the world: they are still dead.
If Jesus has not been raised, he has no power over death and sin, and we have nothing to hope for except hell.  In verse 17 and following Paul writes, “And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins.  Then those who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost.  If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men.”

From The Acts of The Apostles

Crucifixion_saint_andrewReading the Book of Acts a clear contrast surfaces between the early church and the American church of today.  There is an exception that proves every rule, they say, so this opinion of mine is not meant to include every single church in the land, but I do believe it true of the lion’s share.  The early church, as it existed before committees and business meetings, cantatas and 5th Sundays, steeples and Robert’s Rules of Order was motivated by two things: the discipleship of current believers and the evangelism of those who were not.  The same holds true of today’s church (universal), on paper at least.

What is the standard-issue church of 2013 passionate about?  Ok, let’s be honest, most of 2013 churches are actually 1879 churches.  Where else but the church would you find an organization more reluctant to change a single detail?  Not theological details mind you, I’m referring to the refusal of First Baptist Church of Everytown, U.S.A. to so much as update a floor tile.  The church today looks remarkably different that the masses it desires to reach, but no so in the early days.  Perhaps that is why thousands came to salvation following Peter’s sermons (do you think he had his three points and a poem?)
We see the sort of personal sacrifice in the early church that is quite rare today.  Perhaps less common is the motive.  Those of the early church sacrificed so that many would know not only the name of Jesus but know him as Saviour.  The early church gave their very lives to this end.  What am I giving today?

From the Gospel of Luke

mirrorReading the Gospel According to Luke, my attention was captured by Jesus’ words in chapter 6.  I will focus on those verses 27-36 and 37-42 here.

Love your enemies?  This is counter-intuative to say the very least.  Enemies are for defeating!   Right?  I mean, if not what’s the point of them being enemies?  “Love your enemies and do good to those who hate you” just doesn’t seem sensible.  What could you possibly gain with this behavior (lure them into an ambush…?)?  That’s just it.  You cannot really gain anything by behaving this way. You.  Or, if I am being honest, me.  That is what is at the heart of the matter.  Me.  Loving my enemies is not about me.  It does not serve me at all, it serves them.  It serves them a peek at the reality I discovered eleven years ago, by none of my own efforts mind you, that Jesus loved me enough to die in my stead while I was his enemy.  Loving enemies does not serve me, it serves Jesus by communicating that undeserved love shown me in a small, tangible way because Jesus loves them just as much as he loves me.  Not more, not less.  They do not deserve it!  Neither do I.
After that gut check, Jesus quickly follows with a conversation about judging others.  For most of us, judging others is hobby to which we devote significant attention.  Some of us are probably ready to turn pro.  We are not just good at sizing up the shortcomings of anyone and everyone, we love it!  Knowing all this, Jesus uses one of the best examples of hyperbole ever recorded.  Just in case we (ok, me) didn’t grasp his meaning when he said we are “blind leading the blind” he says “Why are you so concerned about a speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye?  You have a plank in your own!”  Hypocrisy.  Jesus used that word a lot, and he was always right.   What was it he said about casting the first stone?  Oh yeah.  Maybe I should go look in the mirror for a bit instead.
This is not about condoning sin, it’s about realizing our (my) own.  Remember: not more, not less.  They don’t deserve it.  Neither do I.

Jesus Paid It All

 

crossIt is critical to understand that Jesus’ death on the cross was a voluntary surrender to redeem you and I.  The willful self-sacrifice of Jesus is representative of how we must come to accept that salvation.  That does not make it easy, mind you.  Jesus knew why he had come, to do the will of his Father who sent him.  Jesus alluded to his death, burial, and resurrection repeatedly during his ministry, but as the hour drew close he prayed that God would, if it were His will, take that cup from him.  We do the same, you know.  Only we are not facing our own execution for crimes of which we are innocent.  We say, “God, please this.”  and “God, I can’t do that.  Something else, please!”  Or worse, “God, I refuse.”  I do not believe it wrong to ask God for another way, place, or time.  Jesus did.  We cannot ignore the remaining fact, however.  Jesus asked if there might be another way, and then displayed plainly his motive when he prayed, “Not my will but yours be done.”  Jesus told his Father that if there was another way he would be glad to hear it, but also stood resolute that whatever God’s will was, that is what he would do.  When God again affirmed that the sacrifice of the cross was the only means to save mankind, Jesus willingly accepted.  To understand that is to understand the salvation available to you and I.  We must WILLINGLY accept what Jesus offers through his WILLING sacrifice.  Jesus knew God’s will, but could have chosen to ignore it.  (Aren’t I glad he did not…)  We can know the facts of Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection, but if we chose to ignore it we have not salvation.  We must willingly respond by, in light of his choice to redeem us with his own life accepting Jesus’ gift of salvation by making him Lord of our lives.


From the Gospel of Mark

The Gospel According to Mark, finding itself among the Synoptic Gospels is predictably similar to the Gospel of Matthew.  Reading the Gospel of Mark this week I found my attention captured by chapter 5.  Here Jesus and his lot have landed a boat only to find a demon-possessed man.  This man had been tormented for a long time.  The townspeople knew him well, and if verse 4 is any indication they were troubled by this individual.  He was someone who frightened them, someone they shielded their children from.  The people had tried chains and irons to control the man to no avail.

Enter Jesus.  As Jesus approaches, the demon recognizes him as God’s Son and cries out in protest.  An exchange occurs between Jesus and the demon (who proves to be many demons) and Jesus restores the man by driving them out.  A herd of pigs sadly becomes a casualty of this spiritual battle, but the citizens rush over to find the man lucid, fully clothed (it seems that had previously been an issue) and sitting calmly.
Were we not familiar with the story we might quickly assume that the people of the community praised Jesus, thanking him for this miracle.  This man had been a problem for some time and now he was made well.  The people can see that Jesus must be from God to accomplish such a thing as this!
We know this was not their response.  The people were afraid and begged, pleaded with Jesus to leave.  I wonder how many miracles of God I have overlooked or opportunities for revival I have avoided because of fear – fear of change, fear of uncertainty or even fear of the cost.  I can honestly say no work of God has ever cost me a herd of pigs, but what are my figurative swine?  What am I not willing to give up so that God can work?

1 + 1 =?

Thought I would share a brief response I wrote to the question, “Why is it important that Jesus was actually fully God and fully man?”

It is critical to understand that Jesus is fully God and fully man.  Does 100% + 100% add up?  No, with the exception of Jesus.  Jesus came to earth as a man.  He hungered and thirsted.  He was certainly tempted, in fact far greater was his temptation than yours or mine.  I don’t know about you, but I have yet to be led into the wilderness by Satan for forty days…

If Jesus were not fully man he could not have died at human hands.  He knew physical pain.  When he knew the hour was near Jesus prayed that God might find another way.  Yet only his sacrifice was worthy to redeem mankind, because he was also fully God.  Jesus did not inherit the sinful nature that plagues each of us as he was born in a unique way, a miraculous way, of a virgin.  If Jesus was not also fully God his sacrifice was meaningless, and we have no hope.  Christ proved his humanity in death, and his divinity by raising again from the dead.  Were this not true, our faith would be futile.  Paul speaks to this in 1 Corinthians 15:19 when he says “If for only this life we have hope in Christ, we are of all people to be most pitied.”

From the Gospel of Matthew

This was not my first time to read the Gospel of Matthew.  Nor my second.  It was not my third or fourth.  It was not even my first time to read it this year, but as I read it this time I was struck by a message I had not previously focused my attention upon.  I have long been aware that Jesus combatted the hypocrisy of the religious leaders of the day, but this time it became most conspicuous, and perhaps for a different reason.

Are we as the “New Testament” church a bit more pharisaical than we realize, or even care to admit?  It struck me as I read chapter 15.  Verse 3 quotes Jesus, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition?”  Wow.  Jesus was in conversation with leaders who were very concerned that Jesus’ disciples were not doing what had always been done.  Why had it always been done that way?  Why not?!  It is staggering to consider that they are talking to JESUS.  Are they at his feet to listen to his teaching so that they can not only walk away forever changed but be equipped to share that life-altering Word with others?  No.  They want to know why he is doing something differently, and just where he found the nerve to do so.
Reconcile that with Jesus’ words in chapter 28.  Verses 16-20 are very familiar to the church.  I think too familiar.  Not “too familiar” because we should not know well the Word of God but instead that familiarity does, as they say, breed contempt.  We as the church give this passage a quaint sub-title and claim it as our modus operandi.  Are we examining everything we do as the church through the lens of making disciples or are we too concerned with our own comfort and traditions?  I am understanding more and more that we the church cannot see the forest because there are so many trees in the way, and some churches (and some Christians) are fruitless because we too often “break the command of God for the sake of our tradition.”

Response to Mr. Stephen Hawking

Just watched the premier of CURIOSITY on THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL.  This pilot episode, if that is what they are calling it, featured the renown Professor Stephen Hawking and his attempt to answer the question, “Did GOD create the universe?”

I found Prof. Hawking’s responses a bit under-whelming to be completely honest.  Without giving a transcript of the entire hour long episode, let me summarize the prevailing point made on the program:

God cannot have created the universe, nor can He exist at all, because prior to an assumption called the “big bang” there was no time for Him to exist in.

That’s it.  This is the best argument that is offered from what the scientific community seems to agree is the greatest mind since Einstein.  There must not be a God in Heaven because time is conceivably limited.  I really thought there would be more to it.  It reminds me of the rare occasions I decide to do some deep cleaning or rearrange a room.  I dig in and drag everything out for a big undertaking, and then loose interest and shove everything back where it was.  Mr. Hawking celebrates saying it has taken 3000 years of human history to bring us to this milestone, the place where we no longer need to invent “gods” to explain the universe, then seems to loose interest and throw out a ludicrous rationale.  The scientific world now enjoys a bully pulpit of sorts, and anyone who would dare oppose these smarter than you types is dubbed a rare breed of idiot.  Well, somehow I manage to cross the street all by myself, but I cannot understand this “no time before bang” explanation.

Humor me a moment.  Let’s say, for sake of discussion, the GOD of the Bible is real. Why would He be bound by time?  Realize that time is not a tangible thing.  In fact time is only a human concept invented to explain a given number of earth’s trips around the sun.  It is not something GOD or anyone or anything else can exist inside of.  The Professor tries to explain himself with an analogy of a clock entering a black hole.  Because of the black hole’s intense gravity, time stands still. Clearly, if time is standing still, then the clock would stop it’s motion.  If this is the best conclusion the guys in white lab coats can draw, my faith is unshaken.  Mr. Hawking, a clock is not the engine of time, it is simply a mechanical device which moves predictably.  Time is a measurement, so cannot screech to a halt because of gravity.  If we would agree that time is measure of the earth’s orbit, then for time to stop the earth must stop… Maybe you get it.  I do not.


Book Review: How GOOD is good enough? by Andy Stanley

HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH?

Just finished SINCE NOBODY’S PERFECT… HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH? by Andy Stanley. This is a pretty short book, easily read in one sitting, and well worth the time invested.  This book is a gospel presentation designed to address the common misconception that “good” people go to heaven and “bad” people do not.

This book is fantastic.  It is a brilliant delivery of the gospel truth.  In addition to adding to my frequent re-read list, I plan on giving this great resource to anyone needing help sharing their faith or to anyone with questions themselves about salvation.

I received this book from the publisher in exchange for this review.


Book Review: Radical by David Platt

Radical by David Platt

I opted to read Radical by David Platt after hearing some friends who are also in ministry talking about the book and how much it had challenged them.  I believe one said it “wrecked” him, meaning the subject matter of the book had turned his life upside down.  I knew I had to see what all the fuss was about so I ordered a copy (yes, I actually paid for this book) and dug in.

This book is certainly true to it’s name.  Platt sets out to challenge the status quo, as it were, at least as it relates to the Christian faith.  The sub-title reads “Taking Back Your Faith From the American Dream, ” and Radical takes a stab at everything that encompasses our modern view of that dream.

His premiss is simply the “radical” idea that Christ has called us to more than white picket fences and credit card debt.  More than SUVs and second mortgages.  Maybe God is not nearly as concerned with the interest rate of our Sears Card as he is with our motivation to meet physical and spiritual needs globally. Platt tells of a newsletter that features a church’s grand new worship center which cost tens of millions, and on the same page celebrates that local churches have raised $5000 to go toward a mission goal.  That’s a pretty accurate cross-section of our American churches.  He tells of churches elsewhere who risk torture and death to come to meetings where they study the bible for hours on end because their hunger for the Word is so great.  Compare that with our local churches, where we often can only be motivated to attend a padded-pewed, climate controlled worship service sporadically.

If asked, I would say this book should be whisked straight to the top of any christian’s to-read list.  This is probably the best book I’ve read outside of scripture, not because it left me feeling warm and fuzzy, but because I too was “wrecked.”  As someone who has been blessed with the middle-class, suburban answer to the American Dream, this book was a wake-up call, maybe even a slap in the face, and I plan on reading it again very soon.

Get your copy and find out more at www.radicalthebook.com